In recent years, the issue of wrongful convictions and financial shortfalls resulting from the Horizon IT system has drawn significant public attention and scrutiny. Against this backdrop, the Group Litigation Order (GLO) Scheme, the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS), and the Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals (HSSA) process have been established to provide redress to those affected. This blog post aims to examine the current progress of these schemes and the journey towards justice for the individuals and families impacted.
The GLO Scheme is a pivotal instrument designed to address the collective grievances of those who suffered from wrongful convictions due to the alleged malfunction of the Horizon IT system. From its inception, the GLO has sought to streamline the legal process for the claimants, allowing them to present their cases as a unified group. Recent reports suggest that over a significant number of claimants have now received compensation, demonstrating the scheme’s effectiveness in facilitating resolutions. However, there remains a substantial number of individuals awaiting their turn in the legal process, highlighting ongoing challenges in ensuring that justice is delivered promptly and fairly.
Simultaneously, the HCRS has been implemented specifically to assist those who were convicted of crimes due to the erroneous data produced by the Horizon system. As this scheme progresses, it aims to not only acknowledge the injustices suffered but also provide adequate compensation for the immense emotional and financial toll endured. Feedback from claimants indicates that while the initial stages of the HCRS were fraught with complexity, improvements in communication and procedural transparency have been noted. Cases are being reviewed, and decisions are being issued, albeit more slowly than many would hope.
The Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals process serves as a critical component for sub-postmasters and mistresses who faced financial losses attributed to the Horizon IT system’s failures. As individuals navigate through this appeals process, many are experiencing the intricacies of legal deliberation. Progress here has been steady, but there are calls for expedited review processes; stakeholders express concern that the lengthy wait times may further exacerbate the financial hardships already incurred by the claimants.
It is integral to recognise that while strides have been made within these redress schemes, the road to complete justice is still lengthy and fraught with obstacles. Transparency, compassion, and a commitment to rectifying past errors must remain at the forefront of the approaches taken by the governing bodies. The ongoing feedback from affected individuals is invaluable in shaping the refinement of these processes, ensuring they are both accessible and equitable.
As we look to the future, there is cautious optimism among stakeholders that these schemes will evolve to better meet the needs of those impacted by the Horizon scandal. Continuous updates from the authorities and engagement with claimants will be vital in fostering trust and ensuring that every individual receive the justice and reparation they so rightly deserve. The commitment to rectifying these injustices is paramount, and it is hoped that the next chapter will bring about healing and a sense of closure for those who have suffered for far too long.
December 31, 2025 at 11:27AM
透明度数据:Horizon 救济计划:2025 年进展报告
关于在集体诉讼命令(GLO)计划、Horizon 定罪救济计划(HCRS)和 Horizon 短缺计划上诉(HSSA)处理过程中救济进展的报告。


Our Collaborations With