Title: Seeking Views and Evidence to Assess the GCA’s Performance under the GCA Act 2013

We are inviting stakeholders, researchers, practitioners, and members of the public to contribute their views and evidence on how the Gambling Commission Authority (GCA) is performing against the measures established in the Gambling and Civic Administration (GCA) Act 2013. This is an open opportunity to inform government evaluation and accountability processes, ensuring that the GCA’s activities align with statutory objectives, statutory duties, and the expectations of those affected by its work.

Why this call matters
The GCA Act 2013 sets out a framework for the GCA to regulate, monitor, and report on gambling operations, protect vulnerable groups, promote fairness and transparency, and foster responsible industry practices. Regular assessment against these measures is essential for:
– Demonstrating accountability to the public and Parliament
– Identifying where the GCA is succeeding and where enhancements are needed
– Guiding resource allocation and strategic priorities
– Improving policy relevance by drawing on external insights and lived experiences

What kind of evidence we’re seeking
We welcome a broad range of evidence and perspectives, including but not limited to:
– Quantitative data: performance metrics, licensing timelines, enforcement outcomes, compliance rates, consumer protection indicators, and cost-effectiveness analyses.
– Qualitative insights: stakeholder interviews, case studies, consumer testimonies, industry feedback, and civil society perspectives on governance, transparency, and stakeholder engagement.
– Regulatory impact considerations: assessments of how the GCA Act 2013 objectives are being translated into practice, including any unintended consequences or barriers to achievement.
– Comparative analysis: learnings from other regulatory bodies, both domestically and internationally, that may illuminate best practices or novel approaches.
– Equity and accessibility: evidence on how the GCA’s regulation affects diverse groups, including measures of accessibility, fairness, and mitigating disparities.

Areas of focus aligned with the Act
While the call is broad, submissions may consider the following priority areas to align with the Act’s aims:
– Consumer protection: effectiveness of measures to prevent gambling-related harm, information provision, and accessibility of support services.
– Licensing and enforcement: efficiency, consistency, and proportionality in granting licences, monitoring compliance, and taking enforcement action.
– Transparency and accountability: openness of decision-making, data sharing where appropriate, and how public-facing information reflects performance against targets.
– Governance and risk management: clarity of governance structures, risk management processes, and internal controls.
– Innovation and consumer choice: balancing innovation in gambling products with safeguards, competition, and consumer welfare.
– Public health and social impact: assessment of gambling-related harms and the GCA’s role in mitigating them.
– Environmental and economic considerations: responsible business practices and the impact of regulatory measures on the economy and communities.

How to contribute
We encourage submissions in any of the following formats:
– Written evidence: concise written responses addressing specific questions or broad themes.
– Data-Driven submissions: datasets, dashboards, or summaries of metrics that illustrate performance against the Act’s measures.
– Case studies: real-world examples of regulatory actions, outcomes, and lessons learned.
– Public consultations: comments on draft performance frameworks, indicators, or proposed measurement approaches.
– Expert analyses: research papers or policy analyses that provide context, methodology, or interpretation of findings.

Submission guidance
– Be clear about the source of your information and its limitations.
– Where possible, provide dates, sample sizes, and context to aid interpretation.
– Distinguish between evidence, interpretation, and recommendations.
– Consider identifying potential risks or biases and how they were mitigated.
– Indicate whether you are comfortable with your submission being published publicly and whether any redactions are required.

Assessment process
All submissions will be reviewed by a panel comprising officials, independent experts, and representatives from stakeholder groups. Submissions will be assessed for relevance, rigour, and the extent to which they illuminate performance against the GCA Act 2013 measures. Where appropriate, supplementary questions may be asked to clarify or expand on the provided information.

Timeline and next steps
– Call for views and evidence open: [insert date]
– Deadline for submissions: [insert date]
– Preliminary synthesis and themes: within [X] weeks after the deadline
– Publication of findings: [insert date]
– Follow-up actions: as recommended by the assessment

How your submission can influence policy and practice
Your views and evidence will directly inform:
– The design or refinement of performance indicators and reporting mechanisms
– Policy decisions about regulatory priorities and resource allocation
– Public communications about what the GCA is achieving and where improvements are needed
– Future reforms to align regulatory practice with the aims of the GCA Act 2013

A collaborative undertaking
This is a collective effort to strengthen regulatory governance and protect consumers. By sharing robust evidence and thoughtful analysis, you contribute to a clearer, more accountable picture of how the GCA delivers against its statutory obligations and how government oversight can support continuous improvement.

If you would like to contribute, please prepare your submission in a clear, accessible format and send it to [contact details] by the stated deadline. For questions or to discuss potential data-sharing arrangements, contact [named contact] at [organisation or department].

Thank you for contributing to an open, evidence-based review of the GCA’s performance under the GCA Act 2013. Your insights are vital to ensuring that regulation serves the public interest effectively and responsibly.

September 9, 2026 at 04:24PM
杂货法官（GCA）：法定评审，2022 至 2025 年
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/groceries-code-adjudicator-gca-statutory-review-2022-to-2025
我们正在征求意见和证据，以帮助政府评估 GCA 2013 年法案中规定的绩效指标下 GCA 的表现。

阅读更多中文内容： 评估GCA在2013年GCA法案设定之绩效：征集意见与证据以辅助政府评估