Title: Progress and Prospects: The Government’s Implementation of Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Recommendations

In this year’s review of the Government’s work on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 recommendations, we see a detailed map of both milestones achieved and miles still to travel. The Phase 2 recommendations, which addressed a broader and more nuanced set of safety, regulatory, and accountability issues than Phase 1, require sustained cross-departmental collaboration, robust oversight, and transparent communication with the public. This annual report synthesises progress, challenges, and next steps to provide a clear picture of where we stand and where we must go.

Key progress to date

– Governance and accountability: The Government has established clearer governance structures to oversee the delivery of Phase 2 recommendations. Senior ministers and dedicated delivery bodies are now coordinating cross-cutting workstreams, with defined accountabilities and timescales. This framework aims to reduce duplication, accelerate decision-making, and improve reporting to Parliament and the public.

– Building safety regime enhancements: Substantial work has been completed to strengthen the national building safety regime. Revisions to guidance, codes of practice, and regulatory powers have been progressed, with emphasis on high-risk buildings, third-party oversight, and better information sharing across the supply chain. There is growing confidence that residents’ safety considerations are being embedded more consistently into regulatory cycles.

– Fire safety and evacuation measures: There has been notable effort in refining fire safety requirements for multi-occupancy high-rise buildings, including better alarm provisions, compartmentation standards, and evacuation strategies where appropriate. Authorities are actively engaging with industry and local authorities to translate policy into practice, while ensuring residents’ voices are captured in ongoing reviews.

– Resident engagement and remediation commitments: The Government has emphasised strengthening resident engagement mechanisms to ensure feedback and concerns are channelled into policy delivery. Remediation commitments for affected buildings continue to be prioritised, with plans to improve transparency around timelines, funding, and project milestones.

– Procurement, competence, and supply chain integrity: In response to learnings from the Grenfell tragedy, steps have been taken to improve procurement practices, ensure competence across the construction and building safety sectors, and promote greater accountability within supply chains. This includes clearer qualifications for professionals and stronger due diligence in the tendering process.

– Data and performance reporting: There is a drive towards more accessible, high-quality data on progress. The Government is investing in data platforms and dashboards that provide up-to-date information on milestones, risk registers, and delivery timelines. Enhanced reporting supports scrutiny, enables better decision-making, and helps rebuild public trust.

Challenges and constraints

– Complexity and cross-sector coordination: Phase 2 recommendations span multiple departments, regulators, and local authorities. Aligning policy, guidance, and enforcement across these bodies remains intricate, requiring ongoing leadership and agile governance.

– Financial envelopes and funding certainty: Delivering remediation projects and systemic reforms depends on stable funding streams. While allocations have been confirmed for key initiatives, fluctuating budgets or competing priorities can affect delivery speed.

– Timelines versus expectations: Some milestones are ambitious given the breadth of reform, the scale of remediation, and the need to balance safety with housing stability. Maintaining public confidence requires realistic timelines and transparent communication about any delays.

– Independent scrutiny and confidence-building: Restoring public trust hinges on visible, independent oversight. Strengthening the role of residents’ groups, external auditors, and assurance bodies is critical to demonstrate accountability and progress.

What’s next

– Accelerating delivery lanes: The Government plans to consolidate delivery into clearly defined lanes with measurable milestones, ensuring that delays are identified early and mitigated. Regular, publishable progress updates will be expanded to improve visibility.

– Strengthening governance: Further enhancements to oversight arrangements are anticipated, including clarity around ministerial accountability, reporting lines, and performance reviews against Phase 2 commitments.

– Enhancing resident-centred delivery: There will be intensified efforts to incorporate residents’ experiences and feedback into policy design and remediation scheduling. This includes more structured consultation mechanisms and transparent updates on remediation timelines.

– Improving safety in high-risk buildings: Continued development of technical guidance, inspection regimes, and enforcement powers aims to reduce risk in high-rise and other vulnerable buildings. Collaboration with professional bodies will help raise competence standards.

– Public communication and trust-building: A concerted effort to explain complex regulatory changes in accessible language is planned. This includes plain-language summaries, visual dashboards, and opportunities for community questions.

Impact on stakeholders

– Residents: The improvements in engagement and transparency are designed to make residents feel informed, listened to, and protected by a robust safety regime. Timely remediation and clearer timelines are central to rebuilding trust.

– Industry and professionals: A clearer regulatory framework and strengthened professional standards are expected to raise confidence, improve procurement integrity, and foster a culture of safety-first decision-making.

– Local authorities: Support and guidance for enforcement, inspection, and response planning will help local authorities implement Phase 2 recommendations more effectively while balancing local housing needs.

– Parliament and the public: Open reporting with independent oversight will support scrutiny and accountability, reinforcing the Government’s commitment to learning from Grenfell and preventing recurrence.

Conclusion

The Government’s progress on Phase 2 of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry represents a substantial, albeit ongoing, shift toward a higher safety bar for building practice, stronger governance, and greater resident involvement. While challenges persist—particularly around coordination, funding certainty, and timely delivery—the trajectory of work is clear: a more robust safety regime, improved accountability, and a future where residents feel secure in their homes.

Continuing attention to implementation details, transparent reporting, and empowered resident engagement will be essential. As the delivery plan evolves, the aim remains to translate policy into tangible safety improvements, sustained remediation, and publicly demonstrated progress that can withstand scrutiny and public confidence.

2026-02-25T12:45:08Z
企业报告：格伦费尔塔楼调查政府年度报告：2026年2月
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/grenfell-tower-inquiry-government-annual-report-february-2026
关于政府在落实现格伦费尔塔楼调查第二阶段建议方面进展情况的年度报告。

阅读更多中文内容： 政府在执行 Grenfell Tower 调查第二阶段建议中的年度进展报告